Canonical Activated-Start Grounding Results

Direct GW decodes are compared with the corresponding activated-start iterative grounder. The raw-start bbox result is excluded from the canonical claim.

DirectGrounded

BLEU Grounding

BLEU direct versus grounded barplot

BLEU: 11.90 -> 12.63

TTI Grounding

TTI direct versus grounded barplots for COCO and ImageNet

COCO: LPIPS: 0.6972 -> 0.6953; CLIPScore: 0.2864 -> 0.2916; FID: 75.6 -> 68.9

ImageNet heldout: LPIPS: 0.6475 -> 0.6469; CLIPScore: 0.3242 -> 0.3262; FID: 51.6 -> 51.0

BBox IoU Grounding

BBox IoU direct versus activated grounded barplot

YOLO11n IoU: 0.4494 -> 0.4433

Symbolic Grounding

Symbolic accuracy direct versus grounded barplot

accuracy_pct: 83.5940 -> 83.5920

Training Notes

Metric Table

TaskEvalMetricDirectGroundedDeltaDirection
BLEUImageNet heldoutBLEU11.903512.6323+0.728723higher is better
TTICOCO val2017LPIPS0.6971770.695347-0.00182959lower is better
TTICOCO val2017CLIPScore0.2864320.291646+0.00521456higher is better
TTICOCO val2017FID75.609968.9286-6.6813lower is better
TTIImageNet heldoutLPIPS0.647540.646865-0.000674901lower is better
TTIImageNet heldoutCLIPScore0.3242050.326213+0.00200819higher is better
TTIImageNet heldoutFID51.641351.0234-0.617939lower is better
BBox IoUImageNet heldout bbox subsetYOLO11n IoU0.4494280.443313-0.0061145higher is better
SymbolicImageNet heldoutaccuracy_pct83.59483.592-0.002higher is better